Three choices for human-machine relationships, and the rise of next-gen platforms
The scene stealers at CES 2017 were digital assistants powered by artificial intelligence. Amazon’s Alexa and Microsoft’s Cortana were joined by Baidu’s Little Fish, LG’s Hub Robot and Mattel’s Aristotle among a host of other virtual Jeeves.
Amazon which had been powering ahead all through 2016 with Alexa reportedly closed last year with 45,000 robots in its fulfilment centres. That was a 50 per cent increase in its robot headcount over a year before, signalling the rapid pace at which automation is moving at the e-commerce giant.
IBM Watson’s augmented intelligence has been quietly making inroads into hospitals and financial firms helping doctors and bankers make sense of data to arrive at diagnoses and spot opportunities and risks.
These developments foretell a significant shift towards the age of the tech-enhanced human: where machines work with humans, instead of against them. Tech enhancement should be seen through a framework of three ‘A’s — assistance, augmentation and automation — forces that have been quietly gaining momentum over the last couple of years and which are likely to go mainstream this year.
Automated software applications that assist human users with search and retrieval related intelligence are getting better. And as their capabilities get enhanced, usage will spike. Research organisation Tractica forecasts that there will be 1.8 billion consumer users of virtual assistants worldwide by 2021 and 843 million enterprise users.
But if you look at Google Assistant, Amazon’s Alexa, China’s LingLong Ding Dong, they work alongside our core capabilities — they complement our own skills easing our tasks.
Augmentation, on the other hand, enhances our core capabilities by providing specifically contextual support that is required to do a task. The way doctors are working with IBM Watson is a great example of augmentation. IBM Watson with its deep cognitive computing skills assimilates vast amounts of patient information and interprets them reducing time for doctors to make their diagnoses.
Similarly, DAQRI’s Smart Helmet can recognise machine parts, read gauges, and could change the way workers process information and get work done. Mitsubishi Electric is using smart glasses to provide air-conditioner service technicians with a three-dimensional overlay that shows them the components of the company’s most popular residential air conditioner.
The third A — automation — takes it a step further, removing the need for human effort. Automation is not complementary to human skills but is a substitute bringing in agility to tasks, a pre-requisite in today’s world. But automation need not necessarily always mean job losses, especially in areas where significant judgement calls are needed. A classic example is self-driving cars.
Tech enhancement will have significant economic impact for organisations, nations and individuals as the three As democratise productivity gains.
The last great example of democratised productivity gains was probably the washing machine which freed up women from household chores allowing more of them to enter the workforce. Similarly, the three As are going to lead to significant societal impact as technology will propel humans up the skills ladder.
As the three As gain traction, we may see a surplus of entrepreneurial productive capacity being created and economies that encourage these will accelerate faster. The labour cost advantage that emerging economies were banking on will slowly vanish. Already, we are at the fag end of the services arbitrage that the first phase of globalisation enabled.
The big losers may well be economies such as India, Vietnam and Philippines that relied on this too much. China, very astutely, has shifted from a manufacturing export-driven economy to one satisfying internal consumer demand and is increasingly adopting the three As.
It’s fascinating to see the different approaches to tech enhancement that industries are taking. In retail, consumer decisions are becoming more assisted. Supply chains that bring products to us, on the other hand, are becoming more augmented.
In healthcare, again, at the patient end there is assistance in the form of chatbots and virtual platforms, while at the provider end there is augmentation (diagnosis) as well as automation (surgery).
Marketing will get more automated but high end selling — for example, investment products – will see more augmentation as humans team up with robot advisors.
In some jobs, we will see automation, while in others augmentation. The exact choice will be determined by the degree to which a job will rely on cognitive decision making versus data-driven models, and the degree to which all inputs can be digitized. Augmentation will not lead to job losses while automation might.
In general, assistance will help consumers make better consumption decisions and navigate an increasingly smarter environment. Augmentation, wherever it comes in, will likely increase the labour pool, leading to a net positive effect on job creation as it will reduce the skills required to take on the work. A classic example of this is how GPS technology has allowed anyone to become a driver and led to platforms such as Uber. We are going to see similar examples in healthcare and financial services where augmentation creates new supply that can be leveraged on new platforms.
The next big operating system may well be the human body. With USB drives installed in finger tips, surgically modelled third ears that are Wi-Fi enabled, body hackers are already attempting to create an alternate anatomy.
But, for now, augmentation and assistance is where I’ll be looking for future platform opportunities as a new class of producers gets unlocked.
Can making product usage difficult for users actually be a good idea? In some cases, yes!
Feature creep is the surest way to kill your startup.
Promoted posts and native monetization can be a bad idea if not done well.